Why Is Classical Art So Good?
What makes great art great? Is it simply a matter of personal taste, with little or no regard for skill or execution? Or are there standards by which an artistic work can be objectively judged? Renowned artist Robert Florczak confronts these challenging questions.
#classicalart #art #prageru
Show More
Script:
How do we know that classical art — as opposed to modern art — is so good?
We know it because it was produced within the demanding standards and refined principles of aesthetics — the centuries-old branch of philosophy that measures artistic quality.
Painting, drawing, and sculpture employ a number of characteristics such as composition, form, color, line, texture and movement to create beauty.
To the experienced eye — and even to the casual viewer — each of these is present in any work of art worthy of being called “art.”
Composition, for instance, is the positioning of objects — elegant and controlled in the hands of a master, or awkward and haphazard in the hands of the inept. Color can be exquisitely balanced and harmonious, or garishly random and unsavory. Movement can be uplifting and dynamic, or static and perverse.
In my previous PragerU video, “Why is Modern Art So Bad?”, I chronicled how art began to decline, beginning from about the 1860s, when aesthetic standards were gradually abandoned.
Unfortunately for the arts, not everyone agrees. I’m sure you’ve heard the arguments:
“Art is simply a reflection of its time.”
“Art isn’t about technical proficiency; it’s about making you think.”
“Art is a matter of personal taste. There’s no such thing as great art or bad art.”
Where do these assumptions come from? For the most part, they are the result of art histories written and taught over the last century not by artists, but by those in the humanities and social sciences. Not having an artist’s point of view or experience, let alone artistic talent, these authors and teachers have therefore framed art in the only language they understand: “meaning and
