What if AI debated the DEATH Penalty?

In this debate, two AI-powered advocates tackle the most contentious questions in modern justice: Is capital punishment morally justifiable and can human governments be trusted to administer it? <br />
<br />
Over two intense rounds, they explore moral philosophy, systemic reliability, and the societal costs of capital punishment.<br />
<br />
Key questions include:<br />
<br />
Does the death penalty truly deter crime?<br />
Can justice systems ensure fairness and avoid tragic errors?<br />
Should society reflect its highest values by abolishing state-sanctioned execution?<br />
<br />
Fifteen AI judges from leading platforms evaluate their arguments, offering unique insights into this critical issue.<br />
<br />
Leave your thoughts in the comments. If you enjoy the video, please consider hitting the like button and subscribing with notifications for more.<br />
<br />
TIMESTAMPS (coming)<br />
Intro<br />
<br />
Round 1: Moral Foundations and Justice<br />
Pro: Justice and Deterrence<br />
Anti: Human Rights and Moral Contradictions<br />
Cross-Examination: Morality vs. Retribution<br />
<br />
Intermission 1<br />
AI Judges Evaluate Round 1<br />
<br />
Round 2: Systemic Reliability and Costs<br />
Pro: Certainty in Modern Cases<br />
Anti: Risks of Error and Racial Bias<br />
Cross-Examination: Systemic Flaws<br />
<br />
Closing Arguments<br />
Pro-Capital Punishment Advocate<br />
Anti-Capital Punishment Advocate